Is the Puff Bar Aimed at Reducing the Addiction Potential of Electronic Cigarettes?
Puff Bar is a good alternative to a traditional ice cream treat since it has none of the cons connected with an ice cream treat. Puff Bar is a simple sweet treat, which makes it a great alternative to traditional ice cream treats. Puff Bar is made with only natural flavors, so it is a healthy alternative for individuals who are watching their diet. Moreover, Puff Bar is easy to create, you can make it as often as you want without having to prepare the ice cream each time. It’s great for kids and for parties because it’s easy to serve.
Puff Bar is a relatively new product, which was developed to test people a reaction to herbal cigarette alternatives. When we smoke we are exposing ourselves to a large number of chemicals, some are good, some are bad. Puff Bar will not contain any artificial flavors, colors or nicotine and in addition has zero calories. The manufacturers claim that Puff Bar doesn’t really taste like cigarettes since it is made from completely natural ingredients including fruits, sugar and mint.
One of the biggest issues in public areas health today is obesity and diet. Because of this many companies are developing products that help people stay trim. The Puff Bar is one of these products, they’re currently marketing them under names like Puff Nosh, Pop Tart and Popcorn Squeeze. The makers of Puff Bar claim that individuals who use their product to lose weight can easily do so when they only need to take with you the small product. The makers of Puff Bar are aware that since public health officials have been calling to find out more on the dangers of empty e-cigarette cartridges it’s pretty clear that the general public wants to know more about Puff Bar and whether it poses a risk to public health.
By calling their product a “reusable” cartridge they’re in direct violation of the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Based on the FDA any e-cigarette which has nicotine must contain an insert that allows one to put it into your mouth, because of this you can’t put it into your pocket or purse to take it where ever you might go. If the product also has an extinguisher it is also in violation of regulations. The reason being that while there is no ash produced by a puff Bar e Cigarette it isn’t a valid device to use to refill an existing e cigarette with nicotine or even to smoke another one.
Because the maker of Puff Bar realized this their lawyers have sent letters to the firms that produce puff bars claiming that they have marketed their product in a way that is illegal. As well as sending cease and desist orders from the lawyers have demanded that the manufacturers cease and desist distribution of Puff Bar of Cigarettes and refund customers money. The letters request they no longer make reference to their product as a “smoke machine”. Instead the business’s lawyers have suggested they call it a “tobacco alternative”.
What the legal team has done isn’t entirely surprising. The issue with Puff Bar is that its e Cigarette product is itself a loophole in the law. This is because there is currently no law mandating that electronic cigarettes need to include warning labels or advertising. The inclusion of a “smoking alternative” could open up a flood of lawsuits that would be filed by municipalities that wished to charge cigarette companies for introducing another polluting type of tobacco into the marketplace.
And also the possibility of a lawsuit being filed by municipalities the inclusion of flavored e cigarettes out there could result in a decrease in the sale of tobacco by non-smokers. Research shows that smokers who are offered non-tobacco flavored e-cigs are more likely to replace those cigarettes with those that contain nicotine. By making tobacco less accessible to teenagers and to younger generations, this could substantially decrease the amount of people who die from tobacco related illnesses. And yes it seems that the addition of the puff bar to a number of tobacco-flavored electric cigarettes could lead smokers to search out “real” cigarettes and not rely so heavily on an alternative solution that may not supply them with nicotine.
It appears that the UK government may have a point. There’s currently no requirement for tobacco companies to include warning labels on the products nor will there be a ban on flavoured tobacco or e-liquid. The thing that these products all have in common is that they can not cause cancer or other diseases. It looks a question of economics that is being overlooked. A solution like the puff bar would seem just like a much better way to earn money for tobacco companies because they are essentially creating products which are more difficult to consume, which means that fewer people will vapinger.com purchase them.